Establishing links and developing a summary of literature in a student’s paper. Part 2

Establishing links and developing a summary of literature in a student’s paper. Part 2

This short article could be the second area of the past one. Please, start to see the beginning.

Algorithm of actions for linking and referencing

The step that is next to sort the sources. To achieve this, edit the range of literary works in a way that every source starts having a line that is red and prior to the author’s surname there have been no extraneous indications. From then on, just press the “sort” button. Please be aware that in the same time, international sources will soon be delivered first, then domestic people, whereas, based on the guidelines, domestic sources ought to be the first. Moving Russian sources will need to be done manually.

View the entire text of this review and put the initials ahead of the writer’s surnames.

Then in the same way they list references to foreign scientists if there are several references in parentheses, it is necessary to observe a certain sequence of them: first, there are references to domestic scientists, beginning with the first mentions and ending with the last years; if references to different scientists are dated by one year, they are listed in alphabetical order if the first author of the work – the same, the references are listed in alphabetical order of the subsequent authors. Used, nevertheless, these rules are hardly ever followed.

Finishing the process of developing list that is literature

Let’s name three final actions to make whenever developing the directory of literature:

While modifying the review, you could delete sourced elements of information with links or add ones that are new. Because of this, the communication for the variety of references to the text for the review could be violated. Practice implies that after reviewing the review, it is crucial to compare the sources into the review text therefore the range of sources used. The simplest way to achieve this would be to duplicate the review text into a different file, delete all the text, making just the links (so that they begin with surnames), sort by the “sort” demand and, by deleting duplicate links, compare them with the listing of literature. It really is convenient for this by printing out of the links. For every single source website link, for the duration of the writing, mark whether there was a source in the variety of references. For every single source into the range of literary works, mark in the review text whether you found a link for it. Without fail, this procedure needs to be done before replacing backlinks in the course of the text with figures.

The work of domestic authors can be tried in the search system of the CNMB and the Internet, and foreign ones in the PubMed database if it was not possible to find bibliographic descriptions of sources to the part of the links.

If in the final form of the review links must certanly be in the shape of numbers, you’ll want to change the surnames in the course of the writing with figures. The final version of the bibliography to do this, print. Further, in the course of the review, replace the surnames to figures matching to the source numbers when you look at the listing of references. Whenever links that are multiple specified, they truly are placed in numerical order.